WFO vs WFG Treatment for Eye Surgery
CONTOURA vs WFO Ablation PRK & LASIK
- Age
- 21 – 50
- Sex
- Any
- Study type
- Interventional
- Purpose
- Treatment
- Participants needed
- 400 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- 59th Medical Wing · Federal
This trial is looking for people who need eye surgery to improve their vision. Participants will have one eye treated with wave-front optimized and the other with wave-front guided techniques to see which method works better.
You may be able to join if
- I am aged between 21 and 50 years old
- I have a stable vision prescription
- I live locally and can stay for at least 6 months after surgery
- I agree to attend all follow-up visits
You may not be able to join if
- I do not meet the requirements for PRK or LASIK
- I want a monovision treatment
- I have a significant difference in vision between my eyes
- I have had previous eye surgeries or problems
- I have a history of dry eyes
- I have farsightedness
- I have mixed astigmatism
- I am pregnant or planning to become pregnant within 6 months
Summarized in plain language from this trial's official eligibility criteria. The full criteria are further down this page — only the research team can confirm whether you qualify.
Think this trial could be right for you?
Answer a few quick questions to see if you may meet the eligibility requirements.
Check Your EligibilityThis is a prospective randomized contralateral double-masked study. Each patient will be randomized as to which eye undergoes wave-front optimized (WFO) vs. wave-front guided (WFG) during Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery to determine which ablation profile provides the best visual outcome.
Loading trial locations…