Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer
Recruiting
N/A
Interventional Study
Rectal Neoplasms
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
Anastomotic Leak
Quality of Life
No Placebo Group
Every participant receives an active treatment — no one gets a placebo.
At a Glance
- Age
- 18 – 75
- Sex
- Any
- Study type
- Interventional
- Purpose
- Supportive Care
- Participants needed
- 256 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · Other
Think this trial could be right for you?
Answer a few quick questions to see if you may meet the eligibility requirements.
Check Your Eligibility
About This Trial
The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life.
The main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surger…
Trial Locations
Loading…
Loading trial locations…
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Men or women, aged between 18 and 75 years;
2. Pathological diagnosis of rectal cancer before operation, with the distance from the lower edge of the tumor to the dentate line ≤ 3cm by MR imaging;
3. No local complications (including complete/ incomplete obstruction, active b…
Contacts