The goal of this multicenter, randomized trial is to compare standby cannulated ECMO versus prophylactic ECMO in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The main question it aims to answer is :
• If standby cannulated ECMO as compared with prophylactic ECMO will improve the outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk PCI
Trial Locations
Loading…
Loading trial locations…
Facility
City
State
Country
Status
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Clinicians decide to perform PCI during ECMO support.
2. Age of ≥18
3. Patient presents with a compromised ejection fraction of less than 35% or at risk of hemodynamic deterioration, or intervention on the last patent coronary conduit or an unprotected left main artery, or co…
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Clinicians decide to perform PCI during ECMO support.
2. Age of ≥18
3. Patient presents with a compromised ejection fraction of less than 35% or at risk of hemodynamic deterioration, or intervention on the last patent coronary conduit or an unprotected left main artery, or complex 3-vessel disease (SYNTAX score of ≥33)
4. Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Subject in cardiogenic shock(need inotrope, pressor or mechanical support to maintain SBP \>90mmHg)
2. Presence of moderate to severe aortic insufficiency
3. Severe peripheral vascular disease
4. creatinine≥4mg/dL
5. Liver dysfunction with elevation of liver enzymes and bilirubin levels to ≥ 3x ULN
6. History of recent (within 1 month) stroke or TIA
7. Abnormal coagulation(defined as platelet count ≤50000/mm3 or Fibrinogen ≤1.50g/L)
8. Allergy or intolerance to heparin, aspirin, ADP receptor inhibitors, or documented heparin induced thrombocytopenia.
Picking one helps us show the most relevant trials first.
Your results are loading in the background — you can
change this any time from the results page.
Set your location to continue
Find My Trials uses your location to surface clinical trials near you.
Add your city or zip code to your profile and try again.