Mesh-Free Versus Mesh-Based Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Comparison of Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication and Transobturator Tape

Recruiting N/A Interventional Study
Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
No Placebo Group Every participant receives an active treatment — no one gets a placebo.
Ready to participate?

Review the details below, then apply to join this clinical trial.

At a Glance
Age
18 – 80
Sex
Female
Study type
Interventional
Purpose
Treatment
Participants needed
147 (estimated)
Sponsor
Mehmet Incebıyik · Other
Think this trial could be right for you?

Answer a few quick questions to see if you may meet the eligibility requirements.

Check Your Eligibility
About This Trial
This prospective clinical study aims to compare the short-term effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of two surgical techniques used for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication (PLP), a mesh-free native tissue repair method, and the Transobturator Tape (TOT) procedure, a commonly used mesh-based mid-urethral sling technique. The st…
Trial Locations
Loading…

Loading trial locations…

Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Female patients aged 18-80 years Clinical diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence Failure of conservative management (pelvic floor exercises or medical therapy) Desire to undergo surgical treatment (PLP or TOT) Ability to provide informed consent Willingness to attend post…
Contacts

Mehmet İNCEBIYIK, MD

+905353374889

drmehmetincebiyik@gmail.com

CONTACT

Ömer TAMMO, MD

drmehmetincebiyik@gmail.com

CONTACT