Circadian Timing and Time Perception in Healthy Adults
Recruiting
N/AInterventional Study
Circadian RhythmTime Perception
No Placebo Group
Every participant receives an active treatment — no one gets a placebo.
Healthy Volunteers Welcome
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Ready to participate?
Review the details below, then apply to join this clinical trial.
At a Glance
Age
23 – 45
Sex
Any
Study type
Interventional
Purpose
Basic Science
Participants needed
128 (estimated)
Sponsor
University of Aarhus · Other
Who this trial is looking for
Think this trial could be right for you?
Answer a few quick questions to see if you may meet the eligibility requirements.
This study examines how a person's natural daily rhythm ("chronotype") affects the way time is experienced and judged. Healthy Danish-speaking adults (23-45 years) who are clearly morning-type or evening-type will complete two lab sessions in a crossover design: one at their preferred time of day (e.g., morning for morning-types) and one at the opposite time (misaligned). In each session, particip…
This study examines how a person's natural daily rhythm ("chronotype") affects the way time is experienced and judged. Healthy Danish-speaking adults (23-45 years) who are clearly morning-type or evening-type will complete two lab sessions in a crossover design: one at their preferred time of day (e.g., morning for morning-types) and one at the opposite time (misaligned). In each session, participants do brief computerized tasks that measure time estimation/production, vigilance (psychomotor vigilance task), decision-making, and responses to social information, plus simple color-vision tasks. Short questionnaires about sleepiness, mood, fatigue, and the subjective "passage of time" are collected before, during, and after testing. A subset will wear a wrist actigraphy device for one week beforehand to characterize sleep-wake patterns.
Testing is conducted under standardized lab conditions with scheduled breaks. The main goal is to determine whether time judgments and vigilance are less accurate during the misaligned session and whether decision-making and social responses also vary with circadian timing. Risks are minimal and mainly relate to temporary tiredness when tested at a non-preferred time; participants may stop at any time. Participation is voluntary. Data are pseudonymized and handled under GDPR. Participants receive DKK 300 after completing both sessions (pro-rated if they withdraw early). Results will be published regardless of outcome, and de-identified data/code will be shared after publication.This study examines how a person's natural daily rhythm ("chronotype") affects the way time is experienced and judged. Healthy Danish-speaking adults (23-45 years) who are clearly morning-type or evening-type will complete two lab sessions in a crossover design: one at their preferred time of day (e.g., morning for morning-types) and one at the opposite time (misaligned). In each session, participants do brief computerized tasks that measure time estimation/production, vigilance (psychomotor vigilance task), decision-making, and responses to social information, plus simple color-vision tasks. Short questionnaires about sleepiness, mood, fatigue, and the subjective "passage of time" are collected before, during, and after testing. A subset will wear a wrist actigraphy device for one week beforehand to characterize sleep-wake patterns.
Testing is conducted under standardized lab conditions with scheduled breaks. The main goal is to determine whether time judgments and vigilance are less accurate during the misaligned session and whether decision-making and social responses also vary with circadian timing. Risks are minimal and mainly relate to temporary tiredness when tested at a non-preferred time; participants may stop at any time. Participation is voluntary. Data are pseudonymized and handled under GDPR. Participants receive DKK 300 after completing both sessions (pro-rated if they withdraw early). Results will be published regardless of outcome, and de-identified data/code will be shared after publication.
Trial Locations
Loading…
Loading trial locations…
Facility
City
State
Country
Status
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* Aged 23 to 45 years
* Able to understand and communicate in Danish
* Completed at least upper secondary education (e.g., gymnasium)
* Categorized as either a Morning Type (MT) or Evening Type (ET) based on standardized chronotype assessments:
* Munich Chronotype Questionnai…
Inclusion Criteria:
* Aged 23 to 45 years
* Able to understand and communicate in Danish
* Completed at least upper secondary education (e.g., gymnasium)
* Categorized as either a Morning Type (MT) or Evening Type (ET) based on standardized chronotype assessments:
* Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ):
* MT: sleep midpoint on free days (MSFsc) ≤ 03:00
* ET: sleep midpoint on free days (MSFsc) ≥ 05:00
* Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ):
* One of four defined chronotype categories (definitely morning, moderately morning, moderately evening, definitely evening).
Exclusion Criteria:
* Current engagement in shift work, rotating schedules, or other forms of irregular sleep-wake timing
* Diagnosis of any neurological, psychiatric, or sleep-related disorder (e.g., insomnia, narcolepsy, sleep apnea)
* Use of medications that affect sleep, alertness, or circadian functioning (e.g., melatonin, stimulants, antidepressants)
* International travel across time zones within the four weeks preceding study participation
* Are classified as having an intermediate chronotype based on validated chronotype assessments (MCTQ or MEQ), as this group does not provide the necessary contrast to evaluate circadian alignment effects.
Picking one helps us show the most relevant trials first.
Your results are loading in the background — you can
change this any time from the results page.
Set your location to continue
Find My Trials uses your location to surface clinical trials near you.
Add your city or zip code to your profile and try again.