Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety
Recruiting
N/A
Interventional Study
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Vascular Diseases
No Placebo Group
Every participant receives an active treatment — no one gets a placebo.
At a Glance
- Age
- 18 and older
- Sex
- Any
- Study type
- Interventional
- Purpose
- Treatment
- Participants needed
- 32 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Sohag University · Other
Think this trial could be right for you?
Answer a few quick questions to see if you may meet the eligibility requirements.
Check Your Eligibility
About This Trial
The study aims to compare the technical feasibility and safety of road mapping-guided versus ultrasound-guided retrograde arterial puncture in patients with (CLTI) as measured by: * Puncture success rate * Access-related complication rate (e.g., hematoma, vessel dissection, perforation)
Trial Locations
Loading…
Loading trial locations…
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: -.
1. Adults : Both male and female participants.
2. Diagnosed with critical limp threatening ischemia (CLTI):
significant occlusions in the femoropopliteal
o Rutherford Class 5: Non-healing wounds or ulcers
3. Failed or unable to achieve antegrade access:
Patients r…
Contacts